06 October 2025 Monday
Time Block
| 9 | thesis |
| thesis | |
| 10 | thesis |
| VBF drafting | |
| 11 | Chat AE |
| AE statements | |
| 12 | HH |
| Hoops | |
| 1 | Hoops |
| Hoops | |
| 2 | bbreWW |
| bbreWW | |
| 3 | 4b Chat |
| Colloq | |
| 4 | Colloq |
| Chats |
W: 6 DW: 2 OT: 2 ex
The One Thing:
Florian Haslbeck Thesis Committee
VBF Reply
AE Statements
Up at 7:15
M&T to school
Florian Haslbeck Thesis Committee
- Finished Ch7
- Finished reading the thesis!
VBF reply
Hi Stephane,
"The Run2 resolved VBF … is responsible for the majority of the sensitivity to SM VBF-HH production as well as kappa-2V scenarios near SM (the merged is not really sensitive). …."
- We see the sensitivity is completely driven by (Run2-boosted + Run-3). The Run2 resolved has only a 4% effect on the sensitivity to SM VBF-HH production.
- The relative impact on the k2v is shown below [1], here the CL is dominated by Boosted, with the Run2 resolved with a small effect.
"Alejandro’s slides make the point pretty clearly that these issues do have a real quantitative impact on the results presented, at the level of about 4% for the Run2 + Run3 muVBF"
- Its true the impact is quantitative, but it is small. Our combined sensitivity to muVBF is 100xSM, this is an exotics search. The change is mu=99 -> 103; it is real, but I dont think very important. The uncertianties (largely statistical) on these numbers are 10x bigger than the difference we are talking about. So we have a ~ 0.1 sigma effect on mu~100, for the "secondary" measurement of the paper (kl and ggF being the primary).
I like your point about not mixing and matching different strategies. So I think we should include the new VBF signal samples in the Run-2 resolved re-analysis (Option c above). This solutions is straight forward and should be relatively quick.
Reading AE statements
multi-Higgs discussion
Hoops
- Good runs.. played well … All wins… covering spreads
bbreWW
- See logs above
CMU 4b Chats
- See logs above
Colloq: Many-body synchronization
Maxim Dzero
- Dont understand